When looking to resolve environmental legal disputes, people choose alternate methods for a number of good reasons. It is best to avoid a lawsuit if possible because they can take a lot of time and money, especially in these types of cases. That's because environmental law is still fairly young and requires much interpretation. By confining it in a strict legal process which forces each side to be adversaries, every step can take an excessively long time and can take unpredictable and expensive turns.
There are a few different types of alternate dispute resolution. Two key forms are mediation and arbitration. While they are similar and usually more effective than a lawsuit in cases like these, they do have some key differences. The main difference between them is that arbitration is mandatory while mediation is not. It's usually a better idea to try mediation before arbitration becomes necessary, so to have better chances of settling the dispute in a friendly manner.
Besides their key differences, mediation and arbitration are quite similar. Both bring in a neutral third party that helps ensure fairness, although exactly how the third party is used is somewhat different in either process. The decisions made in arbitration and mediation don't have to be binding, but in general the decisions are usually binding in arbitration.
You don't have to be involved in a lawsuit to hire an lawyer. In fact, for environmental cases involving high dollar amounts, punitive damages, or physical injuries, it's a good idea to be represented by a lawyer even in alternate dispute resolutions like arbitration and mediation. Having someone who knows environmental policies well can prevent misinterpretations of the law and expensive wrong turns, which are so common in these types of cases.
Issues regarding the environment can occur on the business scale or between individuals, but the disputes between businesses and environmental protection associations are the ones that usually take the most time, money, and effort. Businesses that deal with construction, natural resources, and subsoil are common ones to run into these types of issues. Things like gas flaring or excessive emissions can require the company to pay reimbursement for the damage done to the environment.
If alternate dispute resolution methods don't bring you to a settlement, then it may be time to file a lawsuit. It's important to get a good lawyer for these types of cases because of how misconstrued the law can be. Finding a lawyer who is well experienced in these matters can save you a lot of time and money in the long run, so don't be too leery about paying higher fees for a good representative.
There are a few different types of alternate dispute resolution. Two key forms are mediation and arbitration. While they are similar and usually more effective than a lawsuit in cases like these, they do have some key differences. The main difference between them is that arbitration is mandatory while mediation is not. It's usually a better idea to try mediation before arbitration becomes necessary, so to have better chances of settling the dispute in a friendly manner.
Besides their key differences, mediation and arbitration are quite similar. Both bring in a neutral third party that helps ensure fairness, although exactly how the third party is used is somewhat different in either process. The decisions made in arbitration and mediation don't have to be binding, but in general the decisions are usually binding in arbitration.
You don't have to be involved in a lawsuit to hire an lawyer. In fact, for environmental cases involving high dollar amounts, punitive damages, or physical injuries, it's a good idea to be represented by a lawyer even in alternate dispute resolutions like arbitration and mediation. Having someone who knows environmental policies well can prevent misinterpretations of the law and expensive wrong turns, which are so common in these types of cases.
Issues regarding the environment can occur on the business scale or between individuals, but the disputes between businesses and environmental protection associations are the ones that usually take the most time, money, and effort. Businesses that deal with construction, natural resources, and subsoil are common ones to run into these types of issues. Things like gas flaring or excessive emissions can require the company to pay reimbursement for the damage done to the environment.
If alternate dispute resolution methods don't bring you to a settlement, then it may be time to file a lawsuit. It's important to get a good lawyer for these types of cases because of how misconstrued the law can be. Finding a lawyer who is well experienced in these matters can save you a lot of time and money in the long run, so don't be too leery about paying higher fees for a good representative.
About the Author:
If you are looking for Environmental Dispute Resolution make sure you search online for solicitors preston
No comments:
Post a Comment